<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Only Thing on Your Resume that Matters to a Smart Person</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php</link>
	<description>Best Damn Blog on the Planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cupcake Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-185872</link>
		<dc:creator>Cupcake Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-185872</guid>
		<description>LOVE THIS and agree 100%.  I worked as a VP in the corporate world for 20 yrs, reading hundreds of resumes and doing a mind boggling number of interviews and I always felt slightly guilty because I would know in the first several minutes in the presence of the person if I&#039;d hire them. Sometimes in the first glance (which might be a misspelled word on a resume!)  It is so true that it is about who the person is however intangible that may be. Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOVE THIS and agree 100%.  I worked as a VP in the corporate world for 20 yrs, reading hundreds of resumes and doing a mind boggling number of interviews and I always felt slightly guilty because I would know in the first several minutes in the presence of the person if I&#8217;d hire them. Sometimes in the first glance (which might be a misspelled word on a resume!)  It is so true that it is about who the person is however intangible that may be. Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summertime</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-185020</link>
		<dc:creator>Summertime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-185020</guid>
		<description>I agree, mostly. After graduating from my degree, the only job I could get (beginning of 2010 in the midst of the recession) was for long hours and low pay where they milked me for my talents as I was consistently getting the job done and exceeding expectations. It was, however, enough experience to scrape me to that next level so I started trying for a better job. 

I put a lot of effort into my resume and went to 3 interviews for relatively &#039;corporate&#039; jobs. I failed miserably at all three and realised I was saying all the wrong things. I was being honest, explaining my flaws and where I would need to build up experience as I thought it was obvious I was inexperienced, but clearly had the talent to do what was required with a bit of trial and error (I&#039;m the sink or swim type). A friend that is good at interviews (all interviews had asked similar types of questions) pointed out that I needed to tell them what they wanted to hear as the interview was the main &#039;weeding out&#039; process - say the wrong thing and you are culled. 

So I downloaded the &#039;64 most commonly asked interview questions&#039; off the internet (low and behold, I had already been asked many of them and had said the WRONG things), I aligned my own answers to mimic their recommendations and practised, practised, practised. I then went to my fourth interview. The interviewer was down to earth, welcoming and praised me on the presentation of my CV (I had a graphic designer friend present it in a way that reflected my own style/taste) and we had and hour long interview over coffee. Not one of the commonly asked questions popped up, I was asked more about what I knew, had experience with and what I wanted to gain from the job. None of them felt like questions to &#039;trip me up. This was also the first job that I really felt like I wanted. I got the job.

My moral of the story, be yourself, but put your best self forward. If the interview still goes badly and you don&#039;t get the job, you weren&#039;t the right person for the job, would not have fitted in there and probably would have hated the job. Or else the interviewer was hopeless and you would have ended up with a hopeless bosses. Good interviewers who know what they are doing pick the right people, run successful companies and are good bosses. Be your best self and they will easily spot you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, mostly. After graduating from my degree, the only job I could get (beginning of 2010 in the midst of the recession) was for long hours and low pay where they milked me for my talents as I was consistently getting the job done and exceeding expectations. It was, however, enough experience to scrape me to that next level so I started trying for a better job. </p>
<p>I put a lot of effort into my resume and went to 3 interviews for relatively &#8216;corporate&#8217; jobs. I failed miserably at all three and realised I was saying all the wrong things. I was being honest, explaining my flaws and where I would need to build up experience as I thought it was obvious I was inexperienced, but clearly had the talent to do what was required with a bit of trial and error (I&#8217;m the sink or swim type). A friend that is good at interviews (all interviews had asked similar types of questions) pointed out that I needed to tell them what they wanted to hear as the interview was the main &#8216;weeding out&#8217; process &#8211; say the wrong thing and you are culled. </p>
<p>So I downloaded the &#8217;64 most commonly asked interview questions&#8217; off the internet (low and behold, I had already been asked many of them and had said the WRONG things), I aligned my own answers to mimic their recommendations and practised, practised, practised. I then went to my fourth interview. The interviewer was down to earth, welcoming and praised me on the presentation of my CV (I had a graphic designer friend present it in a way that reflected my own style/taste) and we had and hour long interview over coffee. Not one of the commonly asked questions popped up, I was asked more about what I knew, had experience with and what I wanted to gain from the job. None of them felt like questions to &#8216;trip me up. This was also the first job that I really felt like I wanted. I got the job.</p>
<p>My moral of the story, be yourself, but put your best self forward. If the interview still goes badly and you don&#8217;t get the job, you weren&#8217;t the right person for the job, would not have fitted in there and probably would have hated the job. Or else the interviewer was hopeless and you would have ended up with a hopeless bosses. Good interviewers who know what they are doing pick the right people, run successful companies and are good bosses. Be your best self and they will easily spot you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-184119</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-184119</guid>
		<description>In the Corporate world Judy is correct and the only explanation I can come up with for that is HR and Management lack the intelligence to be able to recognize talent and ability when they see it. Two examples to illustrate what I mean: 

1) During my 23 years at IBM every mainframe account I ever managed had their talented programmers spending all their time fixing the error-filled code written by incompetent programmers - and they paid them all the same. If they fired the bad ones the good ones would have spent their time coding and they would have gotten many times more done! 

2) A brilliant self-taught man I know taught himself computers and knew more about PCs than the best PC techs I worked with at IBM. He built an ISP entirely from scratch - literally. He worked as an Engineering consultant at Chrysler / e-Systems / Ratheon where he did the actual aerospace engineering work that the permanent PhD Engineers were unable to do themselves. He was not eligible to become a permanent employee because he didn&#039;t have an Engineering degree. 

Sometimes corporations really do require a degree (even if you don&#039;t need it and already have experience sufficient to replace it), but other times requiring a degree is simply one of many methods they use to keep their underpaid, under-appreciated employees from leaving. I know this because IBM continually tried to promote me into management (even though I only have an A.A. in music) while they kept telling several qualified co-workers who WANTED into management that they needed first a bachelor&#039;s degree - and after they got that degree - a Master&#039;s degree - for the same position. 

Other favorite corporate ploys to keep from paying you better are promotions with long impressive-sounding titles but hardly any raise and awards in lieu of raises or promotions. The military uses tests and medals in the same manners. Needless to say I left the corporate world in 2000 and will never have another J.O.B. (Just Over Broke).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Corporate world Judy is correct and the only explanation I can come up with for that is HR and Management lack the intelligence to be able to recognize talent and ability when they see it. Two examples to illustrate what I mean: </p>
<p>1) During my 23 years at IBM every mainframe account I ever managed had their talented programmers spending all their time fixing the error-filled code written by incompetent programmers &#8211; and they paid them all the same. If they fired the bad ones the good ones would have spent their time coding and they would have gotten many times more done! </p>
<p>2) A brilliant self-taught man I know taught himself computers and knew more about PCs than the best PC techs I worked with at IBM. He built an ISP entirely from scratch &#8211; literally. He worked as an Engineering consultant at Chrysler / e-Systems / Ratheon where he did the actual aerospace engineering work that the permanent PhD Engineers were unable to do themselves. He was not eligible to become a permanent employee because he didn&#8217;t have an Engineering degree. </p>
<p>Sometimes corporations really do require a degree (even if you don&#8217;t need it and already have experience sufficient to replace it), but other times requiring a degree is simply one of many methods they use to keep their underpaid, under-appreciated employees from leaving. I know this because IBM continually tried to promote me into management (even though I only have an A.A. in music) while they kept telling several qualified co-workers who WANTED into management that they needed first a bachelor&#8217;s degree &#8211; and after they got that degree &#8211; a Master&#8217;s degree &#8211; for the same position. </p>
<p>Other favorite corporate ploys to keep from paying you better are promotions with long impressive-sounding titles but hardly any raise and awards in lieu of raises or promotions. The military uses tests and medals in the same manners. Needless to say I left the corporate world in 2000 and will never have another J.O.B. (Just Over Broke).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-184116</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-184116</guid>
		<description>LOL...that can never happen because truly intelligent people ARE different. They would go insane trying to be &#039;normal&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;that can never happen because truly intelligent people ARE different. They would go insane trying to be &#8216;normal&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Faus</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-183428</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Faus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-183428</guid>
		<description>I agree that clever guys does not rely on the resume! They are up to your characters that’s why personal interview is the last and crucial part not just for the job seeker but for the interviewer as well since they may get into trouble if they have chosen the inappropriate guy for the position.

Since the topic here is about the only thing the smart person looks on your resume, I would say is the last part of your resume– your length of service with your previous employers. Length of service does really matter since it will reflect your character. They want to know how serious or patient were you with your previous job regardless if it was related to your new desired position or not. At least 1 year should be good enough. If you had been 2 or more companies within the entire year you better ask yourself if something is wrong with you, maybe you do not have patience that is why you left the companies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that clever guys does not rely on the resume! They are up to your characters that’s why personal interview is the last and crucial part not just for the job seeker but for the interviewer as well since they may get into trouble if they have chosen the inappropriate guy for the position.</p>
<p>Since the topic here is about the only thing the smart person looks on your resume, I would say is the last part of your resume– your length of service with your previous employers. Length of service does really matter since it will reflect your character. They want to know how serious or patient were you with your previous job regardless if it was related to your new desired position or not. At least 1 year should be good enough. If you had been 2 or more companies within the entire year you better ask yourself if something is wrong with you, maybe you do not have patience that is why you left the companies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Empresas</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-182377</link>
		<dc:creator>Empresas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-182377</guid>
		<description>Work is rarely about grades, or number grades anyway, and I made it my number one priority to relate to people and to have a good personality that helped build up people around me. This is hard to do on days when your personal life is terrible, but it’s worthwhile for your employment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work is rarely about grades, or number grades anyway, and I made it my number one priority to relate to people and to have a good personality that helped build up people around me. This is hard to do on days when your personal life is terrible, but it’s worthwhile for your employment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-182273</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-182273</guid>
		<description>But here’s the question–how do you become an anomaly? How do you bond with the people in the interview? Are there some examples?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But here’s the question–how do you become an anomaly? How do you bond with the people in the interview? Are there some examples?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-182226</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-182226</guid>
		<description>Unless being good at your job involves being interviewed five times a day, what happens in the interview is, or should be, largely irrelevant. Too many times, people are hired on their ability to “talk themselves up” and when they get into the job, they don’t perform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless being good at your job involves being interviewed five times a day, what happens in the interview is, or should be, largely irrelevant. Too many times, people are hired on their ability to “talk themselves up” and when they get into the job, they don’t perform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-182214</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-182214</guid>
		<description>If you’re looking for the person with the highest top end potential, then talent has to outweigh experience by a mile. Yes That said, if you’re actually looking to hire someone for your own company, you might want to look towards experience instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you’re looking for the person with the highest top end potential, then talent has to outweigh experience by a mile. Yes That said, if you’re actually looking to hire someone for your own company, you might want to look towards experience instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaltonFiggins</title>
		<link>http://www.pearsonified.com/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume.php#comment-182212</link>
		<dc:creator>TaltonFiggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pearsonified.com/wp/2006/05/the_only_thing_on_your_resume_that_matters_to_a_smart_person.php#comment-182212</guid>
		<description>I totally agree but people pay a lot for HR departments who don&#039;t.  It&#039;s unfortunate because being someone who has sat on the hiring side, I know that there is more to someone than their resume and sometimes even someone with a weak resume can have 10 times the determination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree but people pay a lot for HR departments who don&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s unfortunate because being someone who has sat on the hiring side, I know that there is more to someone than their resume and sometimes even someone with a weak resume can have 10 times the determination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.002 seconds using apc
Object Caching 268/268 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.pearsonified.com

Served from: www.pearsonified.com @ 2012-02-09 13:42:03 -->
